header-logo header-logo

10 May 2007
Issue: 7272 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Revoke automatic prison recall system, says Lord Phillips

Released offenders guilty of technical breaches of licences should not automatically be sent back to jail, the Lord Chief Justice says.

Lord Phillips says the current recall system had become a “trapdoor to prison” and was a major reason for the record numbers of those locked up in England and Wales.

Concern about the impact of automatic recalls is rife within both the criminal justice system and the government, Phillips said  in his speech to the Probation Boards Association’s centenary conference, and it will therefore hopefully be dropped by the new Justice Ministry, which starts work this week when the Home Office is split.

Recent research shows, said Phillips, that up to 48% of prisoners in some jails were there for technical breaches of their licence. Approximately 800 offenders a month are being sent back to prison for breaching their licences, which has helped push the prison population past the record 80,000 mark.
“I have concerns about a system that requires the automatic return to custody where conditions of a community sentence or licence are breached,” Phillips said. “Such a requirement detracts from

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll