header-logo header-logo

26 March 2021 / Simon Parsons
Issue: 7926 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Revisiting misconduct in public office (Pt 2)

43910
Simon Parsons hails the Law Commission’s proposed reforms to the misconduct in public office offence
  • Reform proposals would give a clear distinction between public office offences and other offences such as manslaughter and theft/fraud.

In the first article on the Law Commission’s report ‘Misconduct in Public Office’ (Law Com no 397), it was noted that the Law Commission recommended that this common law offence should be abolished (see ‘Revisiting misconduct in public office’, NLJ, 19 March 2021). However, the report does not recommend abolition without replacement, because that would potentially encourage or facilitate corruption and dereliction of public duty which could undermine confidence in government and public services. In addition, there are five situations listed in the report where no other offence may be available, or would be inadequate to address the criminality (pp39–40, para 3.49); for example, the neglect of duty leading to serious harm, to individuals and to the public interest such as a child safety officer failing to perform basic checks leading to damaging neglect of a child. Also, the UN Convention Against Corruption

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll