header-logo header-logo

05 January 2026
Categories: Legal News , Family , Abuse
printer mail-detail

Revised guidance on court orders protecting domestic abuse victims

The practice guidance on non-molestation orders has been updated and replaced, and guidance issued on protective injunctions

Sir Andrew McFarlane, president of the Family Division, issued the Guidance 2026: Non-Molestation Orders, which replaces the 2023 guidance, last month. The revised guidance takes effect on 12 January.

The Family Justice Council has issued 'Family Justice Council Best Practice Guidance for Practitioners on Making an application for a Protective Injunction'. This guidance includes a model witness statement, and also comes into effect on 12 January.

The guidance aims to ‘reduce the burden on an over-strained system and improve the application experience for victim survivors’ by simplifying, standardising and modernising the processes involved.

It notes that extra strain has been placed on the system by a rise in applications in the past few years, partly due to the widened statutory definition of abuse ‘coupled with a growing awareness within society of more nuanced forms of abuse such as coercive and controlling behaviour’.

Categories: Legal News , Family , Abuse
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll