header-logo header-logo

01 March 2024 / Marc Weller
Issue: 8061 / Categories: Features , Profession , International justice , International
printer mail-detail

Reversal of fortune for Ukraine at the ICJ

161575
Marc Weller considers the latest development in Ukraine v Russia
  • Analysis of the ICJ’s recent judgment on its jurisdiction in Ukraine’s case against the Russian Federation following the February 2022 invasion.
  • Considers how Ukraine might approach the case, and notes the high threshold for intent.

After its much-observed order on interim measures of protection for Gaza, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) has rendered a further judgment in a genocide case. The judgment concerns its jurisdiction in the action brought by Ukraine against the Russian Federation just two days after the armed invasion of 24 February 2022.

Ukraine v Russia

The judgment will have caused some consternation in Kyiv. The court removed the very essence of the Ukrainian case against the Russian Federation brought under Art IX of the Genocide Convention. The applicant alleged the Russian Federation wrongly claimed Ukraine had conducted a campaign of genocide against Russian speakers in its provinces of Luhansk and Donetsk in justification of its invasion. Hence, the Russian Federation could not lawfully take any action under the Genocide Convention in or

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll