header-logo header-logo

06 January 2012 / Malcolm Dowden , George Hobson
Issue: 7495 / Categories: Features , Environment , Property , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Reversal of fortune?

George Hobson & Malcolm Dowden report on solar vulnerability

The government’s appeal against the High Court’s pre-Christmas ruling regarding its flawed consultation on feed-in tariff (FiTs) reductions for solar installations leaves in doubt the rates available to property owners who failed to beat the 12 December 2011 deadline. However, even property owners who beat the deadline and retained the higher rates cannot entirely relax. As well as the risk of future policy reversals, solar installations remain vulnerable, given the current law on easements, to neighbouring development.

There is no right to receive unrestricted sunlight for conversion into renewable energy. Consequently, neighbouring development could obstruct the passage of sunlight to solar panels and reduce the energy produced by them. Lawyers attempting to protect solar installations may seek either new restrictive covenants or, in some cases, even leases of airspace over neighbouring sites. Either approach can be expensive, time-consuming and difficult to negotiate.

Rights of light?

The law on rights of light has its roots in the need for light to work within buildings in densely packed urban environments. It

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll