header-logo header-logo

16 July 2009
Issue: 7378 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Retirement under review

Employment

A review of the default retirement age (DRA) is to be brought forward to next year, as part of a government strategy to prepare for an ageing society.
The DRA review, originally scheduled for 2011, will look at ways to give people flexible retirement options. Currently, employers can require all staff to retire at 65 regardless of their circumstances. While the majority of people retire before 65, 1.3 million people choose to work beyond state pension age. However, Faith Dickson, partner at niche pension firm, Sacker & Partners, says: “It’s not impossible that removing the default retirement age entirely could discriminate against younger people trying to enter a difficult job market. Having a default retirement age also gives employers some certainty about managing their workforce. While you can’t disagree with the basic sentiment that people shouldn’t be written off as being too old to work, surely we must also give some importance to employers having certainty in managing their workforce, and allowing young people entry into the job market?

“Since pension schemes currently enjoy a number of exceptions from the general principles of the anti-age discrimination legislation, those of us in the pensions world can only hope that this doesn’t become the first in a long line of reviews of the exceptions that apply under the legislation.”

Issue: 7378 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll