header-logo header-logo

25 November 2010 / James Davies
Issue: 7443 / Categories: Opinion , Employment
printer mail-detail

Retired by default

Some age-old issues & the demise of the DRA...

James Davies reports on some age-old issues & the demise of the DRA

In its response to the government’s consultation document on phasing out the default retirement age (DRA), the Employment Lawyers Association (ELA) concluded that the proposals to phase out DRA from April 2011, with transitional arrangements until the repeal date of 1 October 2011, give insufficient time to adapt to the end of the DRA and could lead to employers retiring employees early to avoid uncertainty. At a time when the job market is increasingly unstable, the proposals could have serious consequences for “older employees”.

The proposals raise a number of issues. Will employers be able to discuss retirement with their staff? How will the transitional arrangements work? Will retirement be a potentially fair reason for dismissal?

ELA recommends that the repeal of the DRA is put back until at least April 2012 to give the government time address these issues and to develop fully the new retirement regime. The government proposes to remove the procedural requirements set out in Sch

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll