header-logo header-logo

09 October 2024
Issue: 8089 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Public
printer mail-detail

Rethinking social care for disabled children

The Law Commission has proposed an overhaul of the ‘out of date’, ‘inaccessible’ and ‘potentially unfair’ law on provision for disabled children

Its 343-page consultation paper, ‘Disabled children’s social care’, published this week, covers the rules governing whether a disabled child can get help from social services to meet their needs, what help they can get, how they get it and how they may transition into adult social care. Typical help includes professional carers who visit the child at home, respite care, community activities or provision of special equipment. Alternatively, direct payments could be made so the parent can purchase these themselves.

Currently, under s 17 of the Children Act 1989, a disabled child is a child who is ‘blind, deaf or dumb or suffers from mental disorder of any kind or is substantially and permanently handicapped by illness, injury or congenital deformity’. The Law Commission points out this definition is from the 1940s and lags behind present-day understanding of autism and neurodiversity.

Moreover, current law is not only complicated but scattered throughout an array of Acts of Parliament, regulations, court decisions, government guidance and local authority policies. The Law Commission highlights that, since the law stipulates that local authorities provide the services required, whether a child’s needs are met or not depends on where they live.

The consultation paper poses questions on how disability should be defined, what remedies should be available when things go wrong, whether the current framework for care should be replaced, and whether there should be national eligibility criteria for disabled children’s social care.

Professor Alison Young, commissioner for public law, said: ‘The children who need help from social services have changed over time as our awareness and understanding of particular conditions has developed.’ 

The consultation closes on 20 January 2025.

Issue: 8089 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Public
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll