header-logo header-logo

01 July 2010
Issue: 7424 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Rethinking general counsel

General counsel (GCs) need to measure their performance and commercial value in order to gain the wider business influence they seek.

General counsel (GCs) need to measure their performance and commercial value in order to gain the wider business influence they seek.

Research by Nabarro LLP among GCs and CEOs over the past year found nearly one in seven GCs feel it is not particularly important that the in-house legal team should add commercial value to the business. None of the CEOs agreed.

Most GCs expressed a desire to reach the top of their companies in terms of board influence and involvement in strategic planning and development of commercial opportunities. The research showed they need to measure their value and demonstrate it in order to succeed.

However, less than a third of GCs use a formal performance measurement system.

Jonathan Warne, partner at Nabarro, says: “Measuring value is often seen as a challenging process for an in-house legal team.

“There may be concerns about resourcing, the introduction of bureaucracy or inadequate returns. Our conversations with GCs and experts in the field suggest it need not be that way.

“Simple and practical approaches and systems can be introduced to clarify objectives, improve performance and measure value. Such tools should make it easier to run an in-house legal department, and may also make it simpler to identify areas in which GCs and other senior in-house lawyers can attain leadership.”
 

Issue: 7424 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll