header-logo header-logo

22 October 2009 / Malcolm Dowden
Issue: 7390 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Restrictive covenants

Malcolm Dowden unravels the complexities of enforcing restrictive covenants in building schemes

Building schemes arise where land has been developed by being laid out in plots and then sold to different buyers. Each buyer enters into restrictive covenants with the common seller restricting the use of the particular plot for the benefit of the estate generally.

Their purpose is to preserve the value of the estate and to prevent, for instance, business use in a residential area. The owner for the time being of each plot is bound by the scheme and he can enforce its rules against all other owners governed by the scheme. Restrictive covenants contained within the scheme are also enforceable by owners of sub-divisions of land within the scheme (Brunner v Greenslade [1970] 3 All ER 833).

A building scheme requires: an intention to impose mutually enforceable restrictions in the interest of all the buyers and their successors; and a clearly defined area affected by the scheme, and known to the buyers.

A building scheme constitutes a local law, binding the buyers of the various lots included in the scheme and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll