header-logo header-logo

02 October 2008
Issue: 7339 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Responsible parents

Dorothea Gartland discusses the difficulties of obtaining parental responsibility orders prior to adoption

In Re G [2008] EWCA Civ 105, [2008] All ER (D) 272 (Mar) the Court of Appeal dealt with the requirements of s 84(4) of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 (ACA 2002), which dictates the determination of parental responsibility prior to adoption abroad. The judgment of the court was given by the president, Sir Mark Potter, who noted at para 19:

“Section 84 of the 2002 Act has attracted a great deal of criticism both from practitioners and the family judiciary on the basis that it operates as a significant disincentive to prospective adopters from abroad…there is, of course, the provision in section 86(2) of the 2002 Act which enables parliament by regulations to disapply section 85 if the prospective adopters are parents, relatives or guardians of the child in question (or one of them is). No such regulations have, however, been made.”
Adoption plans

In this case the child, G, was subject to a care order to the local authority with the plan for her to be adopted by a couple, C.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll