header-logo header-logo

18 October 2013 / Sarah Playforth
Issue: 7580 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Respecting our elders

Are parents being left out in Inheritance Act claims, asks Sarah Playforth

Let’s face it—lawyers, judges and legislators don’t have the best reputation for keeping up with society and being, as the kids used to say about 50 years ago, “with it”. But, to their credit, they keep trying. A good example of this is the law around financial provision after death. Over the last 20 or so years, incremental changes have been made to the intestacy rules and Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (I(PFD)A 1975) to try and keep abreast of social reality. The provision for spouses (and now civil partners), has increased; unmarried partners have been able to make a I(PFD)A 1975 claim since 1996; and claims by adult children are being increasingly entertained by the courts.

This area of law is receiving another timely makeover under the Inheritance and Trustees’ Powers Bill, which is currently making its way through Parliament.

The laudable purpose of the Bill is to make the law work for as many different types of family as possible. This recognises the wonderful truth that the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll