header-logo header-logo

27 November 2019
Issue: 7866 / Categories: Features , Profession , ADR
printer mail-detail

Resolving intractable disputes: best practice

Enforcing contractual clauses to mediate, not litigate. Rob Langley, a mediator at North East Mediation Solutions, reports on how new rules are developing
  • The court has a discretion to stay proceedings commenced in breach of an enforceable dispute resolution agreement.

Although not all business-people—or their lawyers—are convinced of the benefits of avoiding the courts, most are; and many commercial agreements now include clauses requiring structured negotiation and then mediation as a precursor to involving the courts.

In Ohpen Operations UK Ltd v Invesco Fund Managers Ltd [2019] EWHC 2246 (TCC), [2019] All ER (D) 86 (Aug)the court considered a typical structured dispute resolution clause. Ohpen was software designer which had a claim for £4.7m against its customer, Invesco, which in turn alleged claims against Ohpen for £5.7m. After failed negotiations, Ohpen lost patience with the resolution procedure, and commenced proceedings. Invesco sought an order to stay proceedings and enforce the mediation clause.

The parties had agreed that any awkward dispute should be: (i) referred to the respective contract managers to meet and resolve; failing which (ii) escalated to the parties’ executive committees;

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll