header-logo header-logo

26 June 2026 / Ann Stanyer
Issue: 8167 / Categories: Features , Court of Protection , Family
printer mail-detail

Resolving contact issues in the Court of Protection

253193
© Getty images
Ann Stanyer considers whether the law offers sufficient protection for family contact in care settings
  • The Court of Protection continues to grapple with disputes over family contact, with recent case law highlighting the tension between residents’ rights, care providers’ responsibilities and the practical limits of the court’s jurisdiction.
  • As the government considers reforms to visiting rights in health and care settings, practitioners should be alert to the protections afforded by reg 9A and their impact on contact restrictions.

A review of judgments reported in the Court of Protection since January 2025 indicates that some 25% of those cases involved issues surrounding contact with a protected party. This issue has been brought into sharp focus by the case of SB v PB (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) v Bolton Borough Council [2026] EWCOP 21, as well as by the Department of Health and Social Care’s (DHSC’s) press release, in March, indicating government action following a review of the visiting rights for people in health and care settings.

It is hardly surprising that cases involving contact

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll