header-logo header-logo

02 July 2020
Issue: 7893 / Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Resolution—Juliet Harvey

First-ever legal executive appointed chair of national family justice body
Resolution has announced that it has appointed a new national chair in Juliet Harvey who took up the position on 24 June at the conclusion of its AGM.


Juliet becomes the first legal executive to lead the 6,500+ member body after serving as vice-chair for the past two years. Her elevation to chair was delayed by three months after the postponement of the AGM, originally due in March, as a result of the coronavirus pandemic.

The previous chair, Margaret Heathcote, continued in position in order to co-ordinate Resolution’s response to the crisis.

On assuming the position of national chair, Juliet Harvey said: ‘I am delighted to take up the role and excited to see what we can achieve together. However, it is a responsibility that I do not bear lightly. I will work tirelessly to ensure Resolution continues to serve all members throughout these unprecedented times. The recovery period will not be without its challenges, but Resolution is ideally-placed to support family practitioners to meet these challenges. My message to our members, and anyone thinking of joining, is “Resolution is here for you”.

‘I would like to pay tribute to my predecessor Margaret Heathcote. Her unfaltering energy, commitment, and sense of humour has resulted in Resolution being in an even stronger position than it was two years ago. I know I speak on behalf of our entire membership when I say a heartfelt thank you to Margaret for her leadership, and in particular for staying on longer than planned to help us deal with the current crisis.

‘I am proud to serve as the first Legal Executive to become Chair of Resolution. I feel it is vital that we broaden our membership, recruiting more legal executives, barristers, financial advisors and others into our ranks. Resolution is an organisation for the entire family justice community, not just for solicitors.’

Previous chair Margaret Heathcote welcomed her successor adding: ‘I wish Juliet the very best of luck in the role. She no doubt takes up the position in unprecedented and challenging circumstances but I am sure her strong and thoughtful leadership will see Resolution continue to thrive. It has been a privilege and honour to serve our members over the past two years as chair and I feel enormously proud of what we’ve achieved together.’

Issue: 7893 / Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll