header-logo header-logo

Resolution condemns "travesty" in family justice system

16 July 2015
Issue: 7661 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Family lawyers’ group Resolution has slated the Justice Secretary’s “bullish and unapologetic” response to a critical Justice Committee report on the legal aid cuts.

Justice Secretary Michael Gove said he did not accept the Justice Committee’s findings that the Ministry had “largely failed to achieve [its] wider objectives for reform beyond achieving savings”, in his response to the Committee’s report into the impact of the changes to civil legal aid under Part 1 of LASPO (Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act), published this week.

Instead, “unnecessary and adversarial litigation at public expense [had] been reduced”, he said, while funding had been targeted at those most in need. The reforms had been “expressly designed to make sure that we meet our legal commitments”, he said, and the exceptional case funding scheme made sure funding would continue to be made available “where its absence would breach or would risk breaching” European Convention rights or EU law.

However, Resolution chairman Jo Edwards hit back: “While there have been some welcome concessions recently, such as widening the domestic violence evidence requirements, much more needs to be done, quickly, to protect access to justice for the vulnerable.

“We strongly advocate, at the very least, that the government take heed of the committee’s recommendation that legislation be drafted to protect vulnerable people from being cross-examined by the person who abused them, which is tantamount to a perpetuation of the abuse.

“That this situation, long legislated against in the criminal courts, should continue to exist in our family justice system is a travesty.”

Issue: 7661 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll