header-logo header-logo

Removal case highlights legal aid reform dangers

07 February 2008
Issue: 7307 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Family Law

The recent illegal removal of a child from the care of its mother by Nottingham Social Services highlights the need for families to have access to specialist legal representation in such situations, the Association of Lawyers for Children (ALC) says.

However, ALC co-chairman Alistair MacDonald says current government policy is making it increasingly difficult for parents to find specialist family lawyers locally to represent them when social services seek to remove their children.

He says: “The government’s legal aid reforms mean the number of family lawyers available to represent the most disadvantaged families is in decline.”

A recent ALC survey shows the reforms are forcing nearly a fifth of respondents to leave the profession, of which more than half were the most experienced legal practitioners, and that 40% were intending to reduce or had reduced the amount of legal aid work they do for parents and children. MacDonald says: “What would have happened in this case if the mother had not been able to find a family lawyer to take the case before a judge so that the right decision could be made? As we have repeatedly said, a legal aid scheme that reduces the number of specialist family lawyers able to represent children and families is bad for children, bad for society and bad for the country as a whole.” He says the judge’s decision in this case shows the family justice system works effectively to promote and safeguard the welfare of vulnerable children.

Issue: 7307 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Child law , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll