header-logo header-logo

21 September 2022
Issue: 7995 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

‘Relief’ as SIF replacement revealed

Solicitors have welcomed a decision to replace the Solicitors Indemnity Fund (SIF) with an indemnity scheme managed by the regulator.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) will run indemnity arrangements from September 2023, maintaining cover to the same level as SIF for post six-year run-off claims.

The SIF was scheduled for closure in 2021—a move which would have left retired solicitors or solicitors who had closed down their firm vulnerable to potentially ruinous claims where negligence was alleged to have happened in a historic matter.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘This is likely to be a relief to the many members, and former members, who have been worried that the closure of SIF would mean the ending of post six-year run-off cover (PSYROC) as a regulatory arrangement, when for most there was little prospect of finding alternative comparable protection on the open market.

‘However, following lobbying from the Law Society and other stakeholders, the SRA sought an extension to the fund, so that it would have time to seek views on how to sustainably maintain essential consumer protections and develop a new policy for the future’.

Boyce said the decision meant ‘consumers will continue to enjoy long-term protections when they employ a solicitor for legal advice’.

The SRA will launch a public consultation before the end of this month on the arrangements and rules for the SRA-run indemnity scheme. Boyce said the Law Society would work constructively with the SRA to make sure the scheme was affordable in the long term, provided good value for money and protected clients and solicitors alike to the same extent as under SIF.

Anna Bradley, chair of the SRA board, said: ‘We have been looking at how best to maintain consumer protection for negligence claims brought more than six years after a firm has closed in a cost-effective and proportionate way and have decided that an SRA-run indemnity scheme is the right way forward.

‘This approach will provide that important protection for those who need it, while giving us clear oversight of how the indemnity operates, enabling us to run the scheme efficiently and realise potential cost savings’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll