header-logo header-logo

24 June 2010 / Sophie Kemp , Stephen Parkinson
Issue: 7423 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

Reimbursing acquitted defendants

Ken Clarke, the newly appointed lord chancellor, faced a dilemma within days of taking up his new job.

Ken Clarke, the newly appointed lord chancellor, faced a dilemma within days of taking up his new job. Should he abandon the previous government’s scheme, introduced last October, which for the first time had forced many acquitted defendants to bear most of the costs they had paid for their defence? He was facing a judicial review action brought by the Law Society which was to be heard within days and his prospects did not look good.  In opposition, the Conservatives had opposed the scheme, and it was deeply unpopular with the legal profession and, to the extent that they were aware of it, the public.

It should have been an easy call, but the timing was difficult. How would it look to abandon potential savings of £20m when the government was hoping to achieve £6bn of savings this year? In the end he chose to press on, and duly lost. He now has to decide

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll