header-logo header-logo

07 August 2013
Issue: 7572 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Regulator seeks private eye info

SRA await evidence linked to phone hacking scandal

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has still not been told the names of the 22 law firms alleged to have used private investigators implicated in the phone hacking scandal.

The firms are among 102 blue-chip companies listed by the Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA) as clients of four investigators convicted of data offences last year. This does not mean that those firms were complicit in, or condoned, any illegal practices.

The SOCA list has been passed to the Home Affairs Select Committee on condition it remains confidential.

An SRA spokesperson says: “We are seeking to establish the position, but have not yet been provided with any evidence. 

“We have requested information from SOCA on law firms who have allegedly been using private agencies involved in phone hacking and are awaiting their response.”

However, the Law Society has reassured firms that there is a “legitimate and proper role” for private investigators as long as no laws are broken.

A Law Society spokesperson said: “[Solicitors] must not break the law or conspire to do so. In using the services of a private investigator they must also comply with Data Protection regulations both domestically and internationally.” 

Law firms often use private investigators to trace witnesses, identify hidden assets, serve court documents, or conduct background checks.

The Home Office intends to make it a criminal offence to operate as a private investigator without a licence next year, with penalties of up to £5,000 and six months in prison.

Issue: 7572 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll