header-logo header-logo

04 June 2025
Issue: 8119 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Legal services , Risk management
printer mail-detail

Regulator sanctioned for Axiom Ince failings

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has been given 12 months to improve its safeguarding of risk, intervention and client money, under binding directions issued in response to the Axiom Ince scandal

It must provide quarterly written reports on progress to the Legal Services Board (LSB), and commission independent external auditors within 12 months to evaluate its compliance and identify any other weaknesses.

Catherine Brown, interim chair of the LSB, said: ‘The severity of what happened at Axiom Ince—with £60m in client money missing and 1,400 people losing their jobs—demanded decisive action, and we welcome the SRA’s constructive engagement with us during this statutory process.

‘The directions we've issued are designed to protect the public and better ensure client funds are properly safeguarded.’

The directions, which are binding under the Legal Services Act 2008, require the SRA to ‘revise its regulatory arrangements and guidance to… protect consumers and the public from potential harm arising from a single individual holding more than one role in a firm or other authorised body eg owner, manager, compliance officer for legal practice, compliance officer for finance and administration, and money laundering compliance officer’.

Axiom Ince grew rapidly through a series of mergers and acquisitions before being closed by the SRA in October 2023. The firm’s owner held multiple compliance roles.

The SRA must also ‘ensure firms have effective safeguards to protect client money’ and ‘put in place measures to enable more effective risk-based scrutiny of firms undergoing sale, merger or acquisition’.

The SRA is due to make a decision before the end of this year on whether it will go ahead with its proposals to stop firms handling client money.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘We have been working over the past months with the LSB on our plan to address and implement its directions.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll