header-logo header-logo

05 February 2010
Issue: 7403 / Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Regulation of Investigatory Powers

Regulation of Investigatory Powers (Covert Human Intelligence Sources: Matters Subject to Legal Privilege) Order 2010

Exercises the power conferred on the Secretary of State by the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (Act), s 29(2)(c), (7)(b), which makes provision for the granting of authorisations for the conduct or the use of a covert human intelligence source, to impose additional requirements that must be satisfied before an authorisation is granted or renewed.

An authorisation cannot be granted or renewed until it has been approved either by the Secretary of State or by an ordinary Surveillance Commissioner. The Surveillance Commissioner may only give his approval if satisfied there are reasonable grounds for believing the authorisation is necessary in the interests of national security.

 

In force : 18 February 2010

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll