header-logo header-logo

20 February 2026 / Andrew Francis
Issue: 8150 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Regulating the short let

242979
Andrew Francis tells some cautionary tales of restrictive covenants used for holiday & other short-term lettings
  • This article examines problems arising from restrictive covenants on short-term lets.
  • It examines the case law in relation to breach, which show the importance of considering the covenants affecting the title, either at the pre-contract stage, or post purchase where a change of use is contemplated.

Let us start with three examples.

No 1: Your client has instructed you to act on the purchase of the freehold title to a house by the sea. This is subject to a restrictive covenant providing that the property is ‘only to be used as a private dwelling house’. There is also a ‘no nuisance or annoyance’ covenant. Your client has told you that it intends to use the house for short-term/Airbnb letting during the holiday season.

No 2: Your client has instructed you to act on the purchase of a leasehold residential flat in central London. This is subject to tenant’s covenants providing that the property is ‘only to be used as a private residence’ and against

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll