header-logo header-logo

13 September 2012
Issue: 7529 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Regulating the referral fees ban

SRA will not provide detailed rules on referral fee ban

Solicitors’ demands for detailed rules to help them comply with the forthcoming ban on referral fees in personal injury cases will not be met, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has confirmed.

The referral fees ban is due to come into force next April, as part of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012. The government is introducing it in response to suggestions that referral fees are encouraging higher numbers of claims and therefore higher insurance premiums.

The SRA intends to use an “outcomes-focused approach” to regulate the ban, which will allow it “to look at the substance of an arrangement, rather than just its form, and focus on those arrangements that pose a real risk to the public interest”.

However, responses to the SRA’s June discussion paper included concerns that the Law Society previously found it difficult to regulate the payment of referral fees and called for “clear guidance” on the ban.

Having published its analysis of the responses last week, the SRA says: “It is not the function of the SRA to provide regulated persons with ‘safe harbour’ guidance.

“However, given the interest in this issue, it is likely that the SRA will publish further guidance setting out our legal interpretation of what is caught by the Act. Our preliminary view is that the definition within the Act is fairly wide-ranging.”

It warns that joint marketing and advertising arrangements are “vulnerable to being in breach”, and says solicitors had raised “particular concerns” about these. It says it will look at the issue “so as to ensure that a clear and consistent message is delivered in the forthcoming months”.

Issue: 7529 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll