header-logo header-logo

03 February 2021
Issue: 7919 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Reforms to CPR on the way

The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published details of a cluster of reforms to the Civil Procedure Rules, including changes on vulnerable witnesses, evidence and offers to settle.

The changes, introduced under the Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2021, come into force on 6 April 2021.

They clarify that ‘following inconsistencies in case law’, and particularly for litigants in person, an offer to settle (a Part 36 offer) can include accruals of interest but ‘where it is silent on this point, the presumption will be that the offer is inclusive of all interest’, according to the announcement.

On vulnerable witnesses, the reforms clarify that dealing with a case justly includes ensuring that the parties can participate fully, and that parties and witnesses can give their best evidence. It deals with the costs provision for additional work or expense incurred due to the vulnerability of a party or witness. This implements the February 2020 recommendations of the Civil Justice Council, in its report ‘Vulnerable witnesses and parties’, which called for rule changes to ensure all civil judges, parties and advocates consider the vulnerability of people involved in civil proceedings.

Currently, the rules prevent collateral use of witness statements outside the proceedings in which they are served. The reforms extend this rule to affidavits as well as witness statements. This implements the decision in Official Receiver v Skeene [2020] EWHC 1252 (Ch), where the court gave guidance on whether there is an implied undertaking that affidavits filed in previous proceedings will not be disclosed without the court’s permission.

Another amendment clarifies that foreign judgments not requiring registration in order to be enforceable are to be treated, for enforcement purposes, as if they were judgments of the High Court or county court. These will include judgments from EU member states for an extended period, as a result of provisions in the Withdrawal Agreement. 

Issue: 7919 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll