header-logo header-logo

Reforms proposed for private prosecutions

12 March 2025
Issue: 8108 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail
Private prosecutors would be accredited, inspected and subject to sanctions if they failed to comply with a compulsory code of conduct, under plans for a radical shake-up.

Currently, private prosecutions are not subject to formally agreed standards—Crown Prosecution Service guidance applies only on an advisory basis.

Last week, however, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) launched a ‘Consultation on the oversight and regulation of private prosecutors in the criminal justice system’. Its proposals—based on the Justice Select Committee’s 2020 report, ‘Private Prosecutions: safeguards’—would introduce a binding code of conduct, requiring private prosecutions to be conducted in a proportionate way and for a clear and valid reason.

There could be mandatory inspections to test compliance, a formal accreditation system for private prosecutors, and a public register of private prosecutors and the volume, type and results of prosecutions they bring.

Sanctions could include restrictions on bringing prosecutions, or a requirement to obtain prior consent from the Attorney General or Director of Public Prosecutions.

The MoJ consultation also proposes safeguards for the Single Justice Procedure (SJP), a fast-track process for magistrates to handle minor offences without a court hearing. SJP prosecutors would be required to engage with defendants and review mitigating circumstances before moving to prosecute.

Private prosecutions have been beset by a slew of high-profile scandals, notably the Post Office Horizon debacle, and the misuse of the SJP against alleged fare-dodgers by train operating companies which resulted in about 60,000 cases being declared void last year.

Justice minister Sarah Sackman KC said: ‘One of the greatest concerns for the purposes of this consultation is how the unacceptable behaviour of the Post Office as a private prosecutor could have gone undetected for so long—and whether better oversight and regulation could have prevented it.

‘As things stand, there is no coordinated oversight or scrutiny of the steps private prosecutors must take before commencing a prosecution. There are also no quality assurance processes to ensure that private prosecutors are taking proper account of whether a prosecution is in the public interest… we must address these issues as a matter of urgency.’ The consultation ends on 8 May.

Issue: 8108 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll