header-logo header-logo

12 December 2022
Issue: 8007 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Environment , Climate change litigation , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Reforms for deforestation-free supply chains

Lawyers are advising businesses to start preparing for regulatory reforms on deforestation-free supply chains.

Last week, the European Parliament and the EU Council of the EU reached a provisional agreement on a regulation on deforestation-free supply chains. Under its terms, companies must issue due diligence statements that source materials were produced on land not subject to deforestation since 31 December 2020 and comply with legislation relating to human rights, including the rights of indigenous people. The source materials affected include palm oil, cattle, soy, coffee, timber and rubber, as well as derived products such as chocolate, beef, leather and furniture.

Companies will not be able to sell products within the EU without this statement. Penalties for non-compliance will be a maximum of 4% of the total annual turnover in each member state.

Companies will also be required to collect precise geographical information on the farmland where the commodities that they source have been grown, so that they can be checked for compliance.

The European Commission will run a benchmarking system that will assess countries or areas and their level of risk. Obligations for companies will depend on the level of risk.

The regulation must now be formally adopted before it can come into force, after which operators and traders will be given 18 months to adjust. Micro and small traders will be given a longer adaptation period.

Solicitors at Osborne Clarke commented in an update that ‘even though this regulation will not come into force for at least 18 months, businesses should consider the source of their products now, and think through the systems that will need to be put in place to produce or obtain the due diligence statement.

‘In the UK, the Environment Act 2021 will place a similar duty on businesses to have a due diligence system in place and to report annually on forest-risk commodities’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll