header-logo header-logo

27 September 2022
Issue: 7996 / Categories: Legal News , Arbitration , Profession
printer mail-detail

Reforming the Arbitration Act 1996

The Law Commission has set out proposals to amend the Arbitration Act 1996 by streamlining cases and increasing protection for arbitrators.

The proposed updates to the Act, 25 years after it was passed, include giving arbitrators powers to summarily dismiss claims, made by parties, that lack legal merit.

The process for challenging the jurisdiction of an arbitrator would be refined, so that challenges in the courts take place by way of an appeal rather than a full rehearing.

Increased protections for arbitrators include strengthened immunity in certain cases such as where the arbitrator resigns or where an arbitral party brings a court claim which impugns the arbitrator, and new provisions to support equality in arbitral appointments.

A provision requiring arbitrators to disclose any conflict of interest would be added so that such disclosure is fully codified in the Act, and the rules on emergency relief would be clarified.

However, the Commission thought the Act was functioning well overall.

Law Commissioner Professor Sarah Green said the Act ‘was a landmark piece of legislation which helped to propel London to its position as the foremost destination for international arbitration today.

‘By making further improvements, we can help the UK to consolidate its status as a global centre for international dispute resolution.’

Nick Storrs, partner at Taylor Wessing, said: ‘Issues such as summary proceedings and emergency relief in arbitration have been in debate now for some time and so ensuring there is a statutory framework which responds to these issues will be very welcome.

‘The potential for summary disposal of claims has long been a topic of debate. If the proposals are adopted it will be interesting to see how they are used in practice. I'm not sure they are necessary or desirable, but equally any mechanism for improving the efficiency of arbitration should be considered.’

I Stephanie Boyce, president of the Law Society, said the Act ‘enabled the growth and standing of our jurisdiction as an international destination for arbitration. However, the world is not standing still.’

Responses to the consultation paper, Review of the Arbitration Act 1996, are due by 15 December. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll