header-logo header-logo

28 April 2020
Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Reforming employment tribunals

The Law Commission has proposed sweeping reforms to the employment tribunal system, including expanding tribunals’ powers, increasing damages awards and extending time limits

The independent Commission, which advises the government on law reform, published its review of the jurisdiction of employment tribunals this week.

Its recommendations include giving tribunals powers to decide breach of contract claims brought while the employee is still employed―currently, the employee must have left before bringing a claim.

The time limit for bringing all types of employment tribunal claims would be six months (as opposed to three months for some claims) and tribunals would have discretion to extend this where ‘just and equitable’ to do so. Tribunals would also be given the power to award damages of up to £100,000 for breach of contract claims, instead of the current £25,000 limit. The Commission said this would remove the need for claims to be pursued in two different courts.

Other recommendations include allowing tribunals to hear employee complaints that they are working hours in excess of maximum working time limits, and reforming enforcement procedures to ensure employees receive their compensation in a timely fashion.

Finally, the Commission proposes deploying judges with experience in discrimination claims in the county court to hear discrimination cases outside the employment law field. There is an overlap of jurisdiction between the courts and the tribunals, as noted by Lord Justice Briggs in his 2016 Civil Courts Structure Review.

Law Commissioner Nicholas Paines QC said: ‘Employment tribunals play an important role in resolving disputes and protecting the rights of workers, however the system is not working as well as it should.

‘The reforms that we have recommended will bring real benefits for the courts and tribunals system and its users. The adjustments will improve employment tribunals’ ability to resolve employment disputes as effectively and justly as possible in one place.’

 

Issue: 7884 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll