header-logo header-logo

02 July 2025
Issue: 8123 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Discrimination , Equality
printer mail-detail

Reform employment law to protect pay

Lawyers have called for mandatory gender pay gap reporting to be extended to cover race and disability when the government brings forward its Equality (Race and Disability) Bill

Responding this week to an Office for Equality and Opportunity call for evidence ahead of the Bill, CILEX president Yanthé Richardson said: ‘Tackling the pay inequality and discrimination that continues to persist in the UK when it comes to race and disability is a priority.

‘Mandatory reporting would not only provide valuable data to highlight where pay disparities are appearing and why, it would also drive behavioural change.’

In its response, CILEX (the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives) recommended stronger penalties for equal pay breaches, and it suggested the government introduce an Independent Equality Pay Enforcement Unit, which could ‘significantly reduce the time and costs of litigation’.

CILEX also called for the Equality and Human Rights Commission to be given powers to enforce ‘strong and immediate sanctions’ for non-compliance. It suggested organisations such as charities and trade unions be able to bring equal pay claims on an employee’s behalf since many workers fear ‘retaliation or victimisation’.

Currently, businesses with at least 250 staff must report their gender pay gap data annually.

Employees can bring an equal pay claim on the basis of gender. If they believe they are paid less due to race or disability, however, they must bring a claim for discrimination, which can be more expensive.

CILEX urged the government to close a gap on combined and dual discrimination in the Equality Act 2010. Section 14 protects individuals from direct discrimination due to a combination of two protected characteristics. However, it has never been brought into force. Consequently, claimants must show their treatment is direct discrimination because of each of the characteristics taken separately, which is more expensive and time-consuming.

Issue: 8123 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Discrimination , Equality
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll