header-logo header-logo

25 February 2011 / Stephen Levinson
Issue: 7454 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

The reform carousel

new_image_30_4

Stephen Levinson assesses the government’s tribunal bandwagon

Those familiar with some history may be forgiven for thinking that the government’s recent consultation paper, Resolving Workplace Disputes, was written by amnesiacs. For an institution less than 50 years old employment tribunals have been much reviewed.

There was Justice in 1987; the green paper, Options for Reform in 1994; Fairness at Work in 1998; the Leggatt Report in 2001 and, in 2002, the very thorough report of the Employment Tribunal System Taskforce (ETST). There was a white paper in 2004, and in 2007 the Ministry of Justice chipped in with Transforming Tribunals. Then again in 2010 the secretive Tribunal Steering Board came up with a Report on Consistency. What is notable about the current offering is that although many of the 13 ideas proposed have appeared before in one or more of those reports no acknowledgement of this appears anywhere.

Alarmingly the only mention to previous work on tribunals is to the Gibbons Review of 2007—a piece of matchless political expediency—which told the world what it already knew (that the statutory procedures introduced in 2004

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll