header-logo header-logo

29 May 2010
Issue: 7419 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Referral fee regulation

The Legal Services Consumer Panel has called for greater disclosure and regulation of referral fees.

The Legal Services Consumer Panel has called for greater disclosure and regulation of referral fees.

The panel, which provides independent advice to the Legal Services Board (LSB), claims that closed bids and auctions mean that work is referred to lawyers paying the highest fees, and that estate agents and insurers use pressure selling tactics on clients to accept recommended lawyers.
However, the panel did not find that client satisfaction or consumer cost suffered as a result of referral fees.

Dianne Hayter, chairman of the panel, says: “Greater transparency, combined with tough action against rule-breakers, is needed to ensure that referral fees work in the interests of consumers.”

For more on referral fees, see Comment, p 745.

Issue: 7419 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll