header-logo header-logo

27 May 2010 / David Greene
Issue: 7419 / Categories: Opinion , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

The referral fee conundrum

Referral fees have always been a contentious subject for all those involved in the provision of legal services.

Referral fees have always been a contentious subject for all those involved in the provision of legal services. The concept of touting for business has always struck a nerve among the profession this side of the Atlantic. The question of paying third parties referral fees often gives rise to similar feelings and, as advertising has in the past, referral fees divide the profession.

Advertising or touting by solicitors was prohibited until 1987. While the ban for advertising was then lifted (much against the passionate efforts of many), solicitors were still prohibited from paying referral fees to third parties. That ban was partially lifted in 1988 but there remained a ban on paying referral fees to reward introducers of business. There were some slight amendments in 1991 but referral fees remained in the main banned until March 2004. 

In 2001 the Office of Fair Trading published a report on “Competition in Professions”. As part of that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll