header-logo header-logo

19 August 2016 / John McMullen
Issue: 7713 / Categories: Features , Brexit , EU , TUPE , Employment
printer mail-detail

The referendum effect

nlj_7713_mcmullen

John McMullen discusses TUPE & Brexit

  • Thoughts on the possible impact of Brexit on the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, which are underpinned by the EU Acquired Rights Directive 2001/23.

Much lawyers' ink will be spilt over the next two years speculating on the effect on UK employment laws of the decision in the 2016 referendum that the UK should leave the EU. Necessarily, speculating on the precise effect of this decision on those aspects of UK employment law which are based on an EU Treaty provision or EU directive is, at this juncture, premature. For a start, negotiations to leave the EU under the authority of Art 50 of the Treaty on European Union have, at the time of writing, not even been triggered.

The UK government has indicated this will not be before January 2017. When Art 50 is triggered it will take up to two years of negotiations before a settlement is achieved. Until then, as the EU Commission (along with the UK government), has made abundantly clear, the UK remains a member of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll