header-logo header-logo

Referees, not spectators

31 May 2007 / Declan O’dempsey
Issue: 7275 / Categories: Features , Local government , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Can local authorities correct misinformation issued by extreme parties during an election? Declan O’Dempsey reports

This article considers how local authorities can use their power to promote well-being and their duty to promote race equality to correct factually inaccurate information issued by extreme political parties. Local authorities sometimes worry whether they can correct such information during an election; I argue here that, unquestionably, a local authority not only has a right to do so, but an obligation.

The powers local authorities have in relation to research and information under the Local Government Act 1972 should provide them with the factual information they need to rebut any incorrect information. The Local Government Act 1986 (LGA 1986), s 2 and the Code of Recommended Practice on Local Authority Publicity set out some of the limitations on what they can do in this regard, although these relate principally to the form and content of the material.

A local authority which has a policy to counteract any inaccurate information put out by political parties at any time will be in a strong position if this occurs during

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll