header-logo header-logo

30 October 2015
Issue: 7674 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Redundancy

United States of America v Nolan [2015] UKSC 63, [2015] All ER (D) 183 (Oct)

The respondent employee had successfully issued proceedings in the UK seeking a protective award after she had been made redundant the day after the closure of the appellant US’s military base in the UK. The Supreme Court dismissed the US’s appeal, ruling, among other things, that amendments to the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 by the Collective Redundancies and Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (Amendment) Regulations 1995 (SI 1995/2587), which required employee representatives to be designated for consultation purposes in all situations covered by the Act, were not ultra vires. Directive (EC) 98/59 left it open to member states to apply or introduce even more favourable laws, regulations or administrative provisions than those it required.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll