header-logo header-logo

04 April 2023
Issue: 8020 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Child law , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Record delays in family cases

Private family law children cases took an average of 47 weeks to conclude in the final quarter of 2022—up five weeks on the same period in 2021 and an all-time high, according to the latest family court statistics.

Law Society president Lubna Shuja branded the delays, affecting custody and residence cases involving nearly 19,000 children during the quarter, ‘unacceptable’. Disposal times have been growing worse since 2016, when cases took about 22 weeks on average.

Shuja said: ‘HM Courts & Tribunals Service has previously estimated that it may take three years to return to pre-pandemic levels, which is very worrying, particularly for cases that concern children and family matters. 

‘These delays are preventing parents from being able to see their children and could mean children are left without the stability they need to thrive. The UK government must ensure, so far as possible, that there are sufficient fee-paid and full-time judges to deal with existing and new caseloads.’

The Ministry of Justice figures also show the level of legal representation in the family court, ten years after LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012) came into force in April 2013, removing legal aid from most private family cases.

Both sides were unrepresented in 40% of cases in the quarter up to December 2022, up from 17% in January to March 2013. Correspondingly, both sides had legal representation in 18% of cases in the final quarter of 2022, compared to 41% in the first quarter of 2013.

Shuja said: ‘Litigants in person require more time and support from the court, which is likely to slow down the system and increase overall costs. 

‘Early legal advice must be reinstated so families can be supported in the court system. This would also make a cost-effective contribution to resolving the backlogs in the family courts.’

Issue: 8020 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Child law , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll