header-logo header-logo

A recipe for litigation?

19 March 2009 / Malcolm Dowden , Elinor Clark
Issue: 7361 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Is it safe to complete on the basis of an undertaking? ask Malcolm Dowden & Elinor Clark

* * * * * *

A solicitor who has given an undertaking is obliged to comply with it. If that undertaking is to redeem and discharge a mortgage, the solicitor must secure that result, even if the sale proceeds are insufficient.

Risk of giving an undertaking

Angel Solicitors v Jenkins O'Dowd & Barth [2009] EWHC 46 (Ch), [2009] All ER (D) 133 (Jan) demonstrates the dangers that arise where a seller's solicitor gives an undertaking to redeem and discharge an “all moneys” charge without first obtaining a redemption statement, and securing the lender's agreement to release the property on payment of a specified sum.

The seller's solicitor had proceeded (without checking) on the pre-credit crunch assumption that the lender would be willing to accept 70% of the proceeds of sale of a property to discharge an all-moneys charge. In fact, after completion, the lender agreed to discharge the property only on payment of 100% of the proceeds. The judge ordered the seller's solicitor

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll