header-logo header-logo

27 May 2016 / Keith Davies
Issue: 7700 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Reading law

nlj_7700_davies

Do law books make a lawyer, asks Keith Davies

Unlike personal and commercial activities, the courts of law and legal activities are part of the public sphere, “the state” in other words. Lawyers and law students, practicing or studying as the case may be, however private their activities may seem at times, are public and not private as far as their practice and their studies are concerned; and consequently their responsibilities in these spheres too are public.

Taking to the law

Those who “take to the law”, like Father William in Alice in Wonderland, must take to the law books, either online or in print. If not, they do not become lawyers. But is this enough even though it is essential? Moots and mock trials and such-like role-model exercises are useful; but it is the law books that are essential and law essays and examinations are nothing without them. But does a law book make a lawyer?

The answer must be: no. Law books are essential in the same way that foundations make a house, ie not at all except as a beginning. Thought and experience are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll