header-logo header-logo

Re-grouping redress

226386
Michael Brown & Harriet Campbell consider the future form for class actions in the UK
  • Recent court decisions have guided claimants on the best way to bring group claims.
  • In group litigation, it is crucial to understand the nuances of the different procedural methods. Finding flexibility is key. While representative claims offer greater economic efficiencies, they carry a significant risk.

Recent decisions from the English courts have given guidance to claimants on the best way to bring group claims. In particular, key decisions on claims brought in an ‘omnibus’ claim form, under a group litigation order and as a representative action may have effectively shaped the future parameters of group litigation in this jurisdiction. This article looks at the court’s approach and the guidance that can be gleaned from recent case law. In light of the Civil Justice Council’s (CJC’s) recent final report on litigation funding, we also consider the potential impact of the proposed simplification of the conditional fee and litigation funding regulatory regimes.

The group claim framework

Outside of the competition sphere (and the financial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll