header-logo header-logo

18 January 2007 / Kjersti Lehmann
Issue: 7256 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Rape date

Timing should not let rapists off the hook argues
Kjersti Lehmann

in brief

 No transitional provisions were put in place after SOA 2003 came into force and previous Acts of Parliament were repealed. As a result it is, at present, not possible to convict a person for sexual offences if it cannot be proved whether the offence was committed before, on or after 1 May 2004. 

 A solution to this unsatisfactory situation is given in VCRA, s 55. When implemented, s 55 will provide that in circumstances in which it is not possible to prove the date of the offence, and the offence may straddle the two legislative regimes, then it may be presumed that it was committed pre-May 2004.

 

 

On 1 May 2004 the central provisions of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 (SOA 2003) were brought into force. The Sexual Offences Act of 1956 (SOA 1956) was repealed, meaning that a sexual offence committed on or after 1 May 2004 will be an offence under SOA 2003. Any offence that took place before this date remains liable to prosecution under SOA 1956. Although SOA

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll