header-logo header-logo

04 February 2011 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7451 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Ransom note

Nothing like a bit of lawyer-bashing to win over the hearts and minds of the British public...

Are employers being held to ransom by the employment tribunal system, asks Jon Robins

Nothing like a bit of lawyer-bashing to win over the hearts and minds of the British public, at least that’s how it seemed with last month’s proposals to reform the employment tribunals. Sample responses to the consultation paper include: “Too many employers are being held to ransom in employment tribunals by vexatious employees and ‘no win, no fee’ lawyers”, and “for far too long the tribunal system has put the interest of lawyers above those of employers and employees”. These were the views of the  Institute of Directors (IoD) and the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) respectively.

The business secretary Vince Cable told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that “the fear” of tribunals was “a major impediment” for businesses recovering from the economic downturn and hiring workers. Listeners were told tribunal claims rose to 236,000 last year (“…a record rise of 56% on 2009…”) and that companies spent almost £4,000 on average to defend themselves

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll