header-logo header-logo

06 October 2021
Issue: 7951 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Raab takes aim at human rights

Dominic Raab has used his first Conservative Party conference speech as Lord Chancellor to announce an ‘overhaul’ of the Human Rights Act before the next general election

While the Conservative manifesto promised to ‘update’ the Act, the details are not known. An independent Human Rights Act review is yet to report. As a backbench MP, however, Raab said he opposed the Act and didn’t believe in economic and social rights.

Giving the example of a ‘drug dealer convicted of beating his ex-partner, a man who hadn’t paid maintenance for his daughter’, who then successfully claimed the right to family life to avoid deportation, Raab said: ‘We’ve got to bring this nonsense to an end…we will overhaul the Human Rights Act, to end this kind of abuse…and restore some common sense to our justice system’.

However, human rights lawyer Shoaib Khan, principal, SMK Law, has since tweeted the case involved a 20-year-old who came to the UK aged three, had close family in the UK, showed little risk of returning to his drug offences, was remorseful and was a caring father according to evidence from his ex-partner. Khan said the case is ten years old and the law has since changed.

Raab confirmed plans to fit some offenders with ‘sobriety tags’, and announced a £30m investment to ‘make streets safer at night’ and introduce a 24/7 rape and violence hotline.

The Bar Council has warned that an extra £2.48bn is needed to return the justice system (excluding police funding) to the levels of 2010, before a decade of cuts to the justice budget began. The calculation, in its Spending Review submission, comes after official statistics showed a rise to more than 60,000 outstanding Crown Court cases during the second quarter of 2021.

Responding, Shadow Justice Secretary David Lammy said: ‘After 11 years of Tory government, court backlogs have reached record levels, violence and self-harm in prisons have soared, rape convictions have plummeted, and many women have lost confidence in the criminal justice system.

‘Yet instead of addressing any of these problems, the new justice secretary chose to focus on vague threats to take away ordinary people’s rights.’

Issue: 7951 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll