header-logo header-logo

14 December 2012 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7542 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Question time

Mark Solon speaks to the experts

Over a third of expert witnesses believe that the reforms proposed by Lord Justice Jackson in his 2010 report will lead to injustices according to Bond Solon’s latest expert witness survey.

Of the 320 expert witnesses who attended Bond Solon’s annual expert witness conference last month, 146 returned their views on the latest legal developments. These include the impact of the reforms on their fees and the number of instructions they receive, as well as the success of cost cutting initiatives such as concurrent evidence in court (or hot tubbing).

Fees

The Jackson reforms recommend a number of measures to curb the rising cost of litigation. However, asked whether cost management—a central tenet of the reforms under which the parties draft a budget for each stage of the proceedings—will lead to a cut in their fees, over a third of experts (36%) said no. Only 27% of experts believe the new provisions will lead to a reduction in their fees and 32% are still undecided. The remaining 5% did not answer.

Certainly to date, experts’ fees seem

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll