header-logo header-logo

22 July 2022 / Marc Thorley
Issue: 7988 / Categories: Features , Profession , In Court
printer mail-detail

Question of fact appeals: paranoia, puzzles & island-hopping

88161
Marc Thorley investigates appeals on questions of fact
  • Recent decision in Volpi & Delta Limited v Volpi set out principles to be applied on questions of fact appeals.
  • A look back at Lewison LJ’s findings in Fage UK Ltd and Another v Chobani UK Ltd and Another.

Appeals on pure questions of fact have long been disliked by the appeal courts. In its recent decision in Volpi & Delta Limited v Volpi [2022] EWCA Civ 464, the Court of Appeal has set out clearly the principles to be applied on such appeals. It has issued a warning to those who ‘island hop’ by focusing their appeals on their preferred select extracts of (supposedly misjudged) evidence, rather than dealing with the entire sea of evidence available to the trial judge.

Facts

The case was about whether CHF (Swiss Francs) 6m advanced by a father, through a company controlled by him, to his son, was a loan or a gift. The moneys were for the purchase of, and improvements to, an apartment.

There was little contemporaneous documentary

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll