header-logo header-logo

24 May 2007
Issue: 7274 / Categories: Features , Costs
printer mail-detail

A question of costs

Karim Ghaly and Victoria Butler-Cole look at the fixed costs regime for low value motor claims

The fixed costs regime set out in  s II of CPR Pt 45 was intended to simplify the recovery of costs in modest road traffic accident (RTA) claims where settlement is achieved without the need for proceedings. Unfortunately, a misapprehension about the effect of the regime has resulted in disputes over the terms of purported compromises, and claims which subsist despite the parties’ belief that  settlement has been achieved.

Section II of CPR Pt 45 prescribes what may be recovered, under CPR 44.12A, in costs-only proceedings arising out of motor claims where the accident occurred on or after 6 October 2003, where the claim settled without the issue of proceedings, and where damages did not exceed £10,000.
To bring proceedings under CPR 44.12A it is necessary that “the parties to a dispute have reached an agreement on all issues (including which party is to pay the costs) which is made or confirmed in writing; but…they have failed to agree the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll