header-logo header-logo

18 January 2007 / Seamus Burns
Issue: 7256 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail

The quality of mercy

Seamus Burns questions the ethical foundations
for the prohibition on assisted suicide

David March was convicted of assisting his wife’s suicide; his case, in the crown court, 19 October 2006, unreported, highlights yet again how inappropriate the blunt tool of the criminal law can be in prosecuting individuals who, by tragic misfortune, find themselves placed in the invidious position of having to take criminal action to relieve the suffering of a loved one.

Gillian March was diagnosed with the progressive degenerative disease multiple sclerosis in 1984. She attempted suicide in June 2004 and in June 2005. Mrs March recorded in her diary her desire to end her life many years before. In 1992, she wrote: “It is the only way I can cope, having an escape route if things get too bad.”

Mr March, her husband, left his job to look after his wife, after she became confined to a wheelchair, which he did with enormous love and care over many years. Indeed, Judge Brian Barker, at the Old Bailey trial, said to him: “You were a husband who not only had a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll