header-logo header-logo

18 January 2007 / Seamus Burns
Issue: 7256 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail

The quality of mercy

Seamus Burns questions the ethical foundations
for the prohibition on assisted suicide

David March was convicted of assisting his wife’s suicide; his case, in the crown court, 19 October 2006, unreported, highlights yet again how inappropriate the blunt tool of the criminal law can be in prosecuting individuals who, by tragic misfortune, find themselves placed in the invidious position of having to take criminal action to relieve the suffering of a loved one.

Gillian March was diagnosed with the progressive degenerative disease multiple sclerosis in 1984. She attempted suicide in June 2004 and in June 2005. Mrs March recorded in her diary her desire to end her life many years before. In 1992, she wrote: “It is the only way I can cope, having an escape route if things get too bad.”

Mr March, her husband, left his job to look after his wife, after she became confined to a wheelchair, which he did with enormous love and care over many years. Indeed, Judge Brian Barker, at the Old Bailey trial, said to him: “You were a husband who not only had a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll