header-logo header-logo

14 August 2015 / Dilpreet K Dhanoa , Andrew Francis
Issue: 7665 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Putting the lights out

nlj_7665_francis

How can developers override private rights of light under s 237 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990, ask Andrew Francis & Dilpreet K Dhanoa

The world of building development seems to have emerged from the depression caused by the 2008 financial crisis into the broad and sunlit uplands of activity. But, a major inhibition on development can be the presence of private rights asserted against the development site. These can be hard to overcome, and the price to release them and the cost of delay while terms are negotiated may be unacceptable. These rights will include private rights of way, rights of light and restrictive covenants. The first two are more problematic than the third, because the third will usually be within the jurisdiction to discharge, or modify covenants under s 84(1) of the Law of Property Act 1925 conferred on the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) (UTLC). There is no jurisdiction to discharge, or modify easements. The proposals in the Law Commission’s Report and Draft Bill on the reform of easements, covenants and profits-à-prendre published in June 2011 (Law Com No.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll