header-logo header-logo

19 July 2018 / Jonathan Goodliffe
Issue: 7802 / Categories: Features , Divorce
printer mail-detail

Putting the cat among the pigeons

nlj_7802_backpage

What can be done when the family pets get in the way of your relationship? A tale of feline hijinks, by Jonathan Goodliffe

An increasing number of family disputes now involve issues as to the custody and ownership of a cat or cats, especially when there are no children and the cat is in effect a child substitute for one or both parents.

Why cats and not dogs? According to a study published by the Institute of Advanced Feline Studies, humans tend to bond in the most profound way with cats, of all animals. Being parted from one’s cat as a result of a divorce can therefore be traumatic.

One cat dispute has now reached the Court of Appeal ( Andrews v Andrews [2018] EWCA 123) and the judgment of Lady Justice Green, summarised below, has clarified this difficult area of the law.

The married couple

The case concerned Rex and Mary Andrews. Rex was a corporate solicitor. He thought he was better than Mary because he earned more than she did. Mary thought she was better than Rex because she

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll