header-logo header-logo

01 August 2013 / Philip Sissons
Issue: 7571 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Putting on the breaks

Philip Sissons discusses the issue of recovering rent after the exercise of a break clause

After a series of decisions in which the High Court has repeatedly found for landlords in respect of the proper construction of break clauses conditional upon payment of rent down to the break date, the decision of Mr Justice Morgan in Marks & Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas [2013] EWHC 1279, [2013] All ER (D) 214 (May) provides some comfort for tenants who have managed to comply with that condition. In Marks & Spencer, Morgan J decided that a tenant who had validly exercised a break clause was entitled to recover sums paid in respect of a period after the determination of the lease. The judgment also considers the proper test to be applied when a party contends that a term should be implied into a lease and is also, therefore, of broader significance beyond this specific situation.

Rent payment

Break clauses included in modern commercial leases invariably include, as a pre-condition to the effective operation of the break, a requirement that the tenant has paid the rent (and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll